By Thomas Davis, DNAP, MAE, CRNA
Over the past few years, artificial intelligence has been touted as a technology that will have more influence on our society than personal computers or the cell phone. The future is here, and AI is already influencing the information that we are being fed on our devices. Search for any topic on google and the page will begin with an AI overview of the subject. AI reviews and summarizes vast volumes of information and students at all levels have learned that AI can generate an academic paper on any subject instantly.
The threat of AI generated plagiarism from high school through doctorate level education is real and has prompted most academic institutions to develop and enforce policies outlawing the use of AI for student generated material. As an adjunct instructor at the Medical University of South Carolina, I can attest that each course syllabus contains a warning to students that plagiarism by using AI generated material is grounds for dismissal from the university. Many professors are using programs such as AI detector by Grammarly , Turnitin plagiarism scan, and originality.ai to detect fraudulent work. APA.org, the guru of writing style, notes that plagiarism software may not be able to fully detect AI generated work because it is original and not a reproduction of other work. Of interest, APA.org also describes the proper way to reference AI generated work that is used in a paper.
In the doctorate level nurse anesthesiology course that I teach at MUSC, the students were divided into four groups and each given a separate topic to research. The assignment was to submit their topic to AI and request a 3-page paper with a minimum of 5 references. The students were then asked to do a critical analysis of the paper written by AI. Specifically, the students were asked to assess:
- How completely did AI cover the topic
- What was missing from the AI generated paper.
- What did AI include in the paper that surprised you.
- What did AI include in the paper that you doubted to be true.
- What was covered incompletely and caused you to seek more information.
- What is your overall impression of AI generated material
Each group of students presented their assessment of AI generated material and provided the following feedback to classmates regarding their experience.
- Overall, AI got the gist of the prompt and generated the 3-page paper as requested.
- Each of the 4 groups reported that AI did not fully answer the question and the students were motivated to seek additional information to supplement the AI generated paper.
- Students reported that papers generated by different platforms generated completely different papers even when the same prompt was used for both.
- Students sensed the AI learns to know the person making the prompt and styles the paper differently for different people. Two students giving the same prompt to the same platform got similar by different papers.
- All four student groups were disappointed with the references listed by AI.
A review of the literature revealed that the students were spot on with their assessment of AI. Artificial intelligence can be helpful in formulating academic work; however, it may be incomplete or inaccurate. The following are limitations of AI when generating academic material.
- Reliance on unvalidated data. AI reviews a vast volume of material on the subject, however there may be bias in the data reviewed. AI has the potential to amplify the bias and report it as fact.
- Lack of critical thinking. AI generates new material based on a review of hard data but lacks critical thinking and the ability to place information into the context of the assignment. Nuances of a profession are unknown to AI.
- Hallucination. AI can generate facts and citations that are plausible but non-existent. Using AI requires fact checking before work can be believed.
- Fabricated references. AI is known to create bogus references in the proper format that appear to be authentic.
Overall, AI can be used to guide students when assigned to write a paper for an upper-level course. Artificial intelligence can provide an overview and be used as a starting point when students organize thoughts in preparation for creating original work. However, work submitted by students must be unique and not a copy/paste of AI generated material. The following is advice for students who use AI when generating original work.
- Do not rely on AI material without verification for accuracy. This is especially true for references generated by AI
- Use AI as a tool to assist in organizing thoughts. The student must do research, critical thinking, and place material in the proper context for the course. Nuances of the profession are generated by the student and are unknown to AI.
- Be transparent and disclose the use of AI as a background for preparing the paper. APA.org has guidelines for referencing the use of AI.
- Follow the artificial intelligence guidelines of the University.
- Be aware of the bias that exists in the data used by AI to generate material.
When given an assignment to write an academic paper, AI can help to organize thoughts however, the work that is submitted must be original work that is validated by your personal review of the literature. Use AI cautiously knowing that “facts” generated by AI may or may not be true.
Tom is an experienced leader, educator, author, and requested speaker. Click here for a video introduction to Tom’s talk topics.










