Flight Path to Patient Safety

By Thomas Davis, CRNA

Flight Path to Patient Safety

747With reimbursement and therefore job security tied to patient safety, it is incumbent on healthcare workers to become actively involved with the process of making healthcare safe for our patients.   Since the publication of “To Err is Human” in 1999, much attention has been given to patient safety, however, statistics still show that your luggage is safer in the airline system than your grandmother is in your local hospital. What can we learn from the Airline industry?

The 1970s were a particularly tragic time for commercial aviation.  In 1977 the collision of two 747 airliners on the runway in Tenerife killing 583 people followed by the famous airline crash in Portland in 1978, both due to poor communication, triggered a change in the way that the airlines conduct their business.   Mandatory training and implementation of Crew Resource Management changed the way flight crew employees interact with one another and ushered the way to a 5 year period with zero adverse incidents.   How did they do it?

Crew Resource Management is a set of training procedures for use in environments where human error can potentially have devastating effects. The focus of CRM is on interpersonal communication, leadership and decision making.   Our patients deserve the same focus on healthcare safety that they would receive as passengers on an airline. Here are some recommendations for taking CRM from the cockpit to the hospital.

All humans are fallible and susceptible to error…period. The greatest disservice that we can do to our patients is to believe that because we have special knowledge or skills, we are infallible and cannot make mistakes.   The airline crashes of the 1970s confirmed that the senior pilot did not have all the answers. Not only can we make mistakes but others around us can do the same.   It is only when we acknowledge our fallibility, and engage with our team in vigilance, that patient safety can be ensured. Regardless of your position on the team, know that you can make a mistake, and also know that you can fend off the consequences of mistakes that others are about to make.

All potential problems must be openly communicated in a positive manner that supports our coworkers.  In an environment focused on patient safety, sharing your concern with other team members should be welcomed and encouraged.   In addition, you must welcome and solicit the concerns and observations of others.   As healthcare professionals, we tend to get defensive when a co-worker points out a lapse in our delivery of a treatment.   With a focus on collaboration, we set the stage for patient safety as we reply, “Thank you,” rather than feeling threatened. Your reply sets a tone for other team members to welcome feedback.

All team members must be respected and heard.   Your knowledge and skills are respected. Your eyes and ears are open and your judgment is solid. Even so, remember that magicians make a living based on creating false perceptions.     What you see and believe may not be true. The TV program “Who wants to be a Millionaire” offers the contestants lifelines when they do not know the answer.   When statistics are reviewed “poll the audience” has the highest percentage of correct answers whereas “ask an expert” lags far behind in accuracy.   When the goal is patient safety, the collective wisdom of the group is more likely to be correct than the opinion of the expert.   Openly solicit and welcome the opinions of others regardless of their position on the team. Often, we can learn as much from people with lower status as we can from the recognized team leaders.

Problems must be anticipated and contingency plans must be in place. In his book Why Hospitals should fly: The Ultimate Flight Plan to Patient Safety and Quality, author John Nance recommends that healthcare workers view every patient as having a 50:50 chance of being harmed.   With a team committed to anticipating, detecting and preventing harm, the patient is best protected.   The team time out prior to a procedure is an opportunity for each member of the team to identify potential risk and offer a plan to prevent harm.   All too often the time out is not given the respect that it deserves and potential risk is not adequately discussed among the team members. As a patient advocate, use the time out as an opportunity to focus the team on patient safety.

Reduce distractions at critical times. Regulating the airline industry, the FAA requires the observation of “sterile cockpit” during the critical times surrounding takeoff and landing.   During this time, pilots must refrain from non-essential activities and conversation so that they can focus on the critical task at hand.   Stories of lapses in communication among distracted healthcare workers abound.   Distraction by idle conversation or use of social media during high risk times of patient care increases the risk of patient harm.   In the hospital setting it is not unusual for side bar conversations to take place while checklists are being read or timeouts are being done. As patient advocates, we must all share responsibility for the focus of the team to be on the patient at all times.

Value every member of the team.   On a recent flight, our boarding was delayed by an hour awaiting the arrival of a crew of flight attendants. Once we were on board, the pilot made an announcement. He apologized for the hour delay and said that we would be delayed a few more minutes…collective groan. He went on to say that the flight crew would be greater than 8 hours without food by the time we arrived at our destination.   He announced that he had ordered dinner for the flight crew and that we would be under way once the food arrived…collective cheer from the passengers. By looking out for the crew, the pilots believed that the passengers would be better served.   The lesson here is obvious. All too often we focus on our own needs and are not sensitive to the needs of others on our team.

As healthcare workers, our best opportunity for ensuring safety for our patients is to follow the example set by the airline industry and focus on communication and collaboration.   Hospitals across the nation hire experts to provide training on patient safety and yet the statistics often do not improve. When training is an academic exercise, nothing changes. It is only by applying the knowledge that improvement is made.   Use the lessons borrowed from the airline industry to ensure that your patients are safer your luggage.

Thomas Davis, CRNA is an experienced Chief CRNA, author, speaker and teambuilding coach.

The Importance of Patient Handoffs

handoff2At a time when patient safety is being linked to reimbursement, handoff of care from one provider/team to another has been identified as a time of vulnerability for the patient.   The Joint Commission has stated that communication failure during this critical time may be the cause of up to 30% of sentinel events in the peri-operative period.   To promote safety, The Joint Commission has identified patient handover as a top 5 initiative.   Closed claims studies have identified a link between handover of care and negative outcomes based on the incomplete transfer of information.

A prospective study by Hudson et al published in the J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth.  (J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015 Feb;29(1):11-6. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2014.05.018. Epub  2014 Nov 24.) explored the link between patient handover and outcome looking specifically at patients receiving cardiac surgery.  They documented that errors/omissions in transferring patient information from one team to the next resulted in harm to the patient.  In their study, the authors found that when was transferred from one team to another during cardiac surgery there was a 43% greater risk of in-hospital mortality and a 27% greater risk of morbidity.

Regardless of the type of case, transfer of information from one team to another both in the operating room and in the PACU is essential for patient safety.  Intraoperative team changes should be kept to a minimum and anesthesia providers must resist production pressure and give a full and complete report when leaving patients in PACU or ICU.

Click here to review an abstract of the article.

Chief CRNA: Building a Safe OR Environment

The model for Healthcare delivery in the United States has evolved from a paternalistic, volume based approach through an era of shared responsibility and now into a consumer driven value based model.  To remain competitive in today’s healthcare market, hospitals and providers must strive for patient safety and satisfaction in the delivery of patient care.  Creating and maintaining a safe environment is foundational to patient safety.

Writing in the Healinghealth.com blog, Susan Mazer writes about the importance of a clean and safe hospital environment.  She notes “The patient environment of care plays a vital role in the discipline of patient safety for every hospital. Demonstrating that the hospital is a safe place for patients and for those that work there should be of the utmost importance for all health care personnel.”  She goes on to list 5 steps for improving patient safety by improving the environment.  Below, are the 5 points from the original article modified to the anesthesia environment.

  1. Remove Equipment from Public areas:   As anesthetists, we are well aware of equipment that is stored in the hallways .  Not only does this extra equipment block the walkways, but it also increases the risk of tripping and makes cleaning more difficult.   Work with others in the OR suite to return excess equipment to the proper place and keep the halls free from clutter
  2. Minimize clutter within the operating room:  Extra monitors, pumps, warmers etc stored behind the anesthesia machine or cart limits your ability to move within the room and increases the risk for tripping.  Excess equipment also reduces your ability to clean between cases and increases the infection risk.  As above, return all excess equipment to the proper place before starting your case.
  3. Organize your cart and machine work space:  Everything needs to be seen and immediately available before starting the case.  Organize your work space the same way for every case so you know where to look for any drug or piece of equipment.  Have a place for drugs, airway equipment and paperwork so that each is readily available.
  4. Inspect your  workspace and monitors for cleanliness:  Don’t rely on housekeeping to get it right.  Look for residual blood or body fluids on your equipment and re-clean them if necessary.  Patients expect and deserve a clean environment that protects them from infection
  5. Minimize auditory clutter:  OK, music is great but it’s not the main event in the operating room.  Patient centered care requires the provider to be able to hear monitors, alarms and be able to communicate with the surgeon.   Keep the noise low and develop a “sterile cockpit” attitude during induction and emergence.

Developing and maintaining a safe environment involves more than the anesthetist.  The entire operating room crew must be on board and work together to ensure a clean, clutter free environment that promotes patient safety.

Clinical Topic: Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Outpatient Surgery

The evolving changes in the delivery of Healthcare in general and anesthsia in particular has created an emphasis on patient safety.  With the push for more cost effective delivery of healthcare, more procedures are being done on an outpatient basis on sicker patients.  Combining the new economics with the obesity epidemic in America has created the scenario where an increasing number of patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea are presenting for outpatient surgery.  As anesthetists, we are tasked with providing safe care and answering the question of who is or is not a candidate for outpatient surgery.

In 2006 the ASA published guidelines for the perioperative management of patients with OSA.  Although the guidelines were good at the time, the Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia felt that the ASA guidelines were due for review and updating, did a comprehenhive review, and published their findings.

An article by Joshi et al published in Anesth Analg 2012 (Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia Consensus Statement on Preoperative Selection of Adult Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Scheduled for Ambulatory Surgery) reviewed the ASA guidelines.   They went on to note that the Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia task force on practice guidelines developed a consensus statement for the selection of patients with OSA scheduled for ambulatory surgery.  Some key points include:

  • Patients with a known diagnosis of OSA and optimized comorbid medical conditions can be considered for ambulatory surgery, if they are able to use a continuous positive airway pressure device in the postoperative period.
  • Patients with a presumed diagnosis of OSA, based on screening tools such as the STOP–Bang questionnaire, and with optimized comorbid conditions, can be considered for ambulatory surgery, if postoperative pain can be managed predominantly with nonopioid analgesic techniques.
  • On the other hand, OSA patients with nonoptimized comorbid medical conditions may not be good candidates for ambulatory surgery.

Click here for an abstract of the Joshi article.

As anesthetists, how do we assess patients and how do we determine who is at risk?  The Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia recommends the use of the STOP-Bang assessment tool.  The questionnaire asks 8 basic questions and gives the anesthtist valuable information about the OSA risk during the preoperative evaluation.

Click here for the STOP-Bang tool in a PDF format which can be downloaded and printed.

Combining a good physical evaluation with the STOP-Bang assessment will help identify those at risk and enable the anesthetist to make an informed decision regarding who should or should not receive outpatient care.

Chief CRNA: Disabled Alarms Cost Lives

Do you ever get tired of listening to monitor alarms?   Many anesthesia providers who are confident in their vigilance and their ability to “know when something is wrong” mute the alarms when they feel that they are needlessly alarming.  Unfortunately, patients are injured or killed every years in anesthesia related mishaps which could have been prevented had the alarms been fully functional.

According to Ana McKee, MD from the Joint Commission “Alarm fatigue and management of alarms are important safety issues that we must confront”.  Between January 2009 and June 2012, the commission received 98 voluntary reports of alarm-related events, 80 of which resulted in patient deaths and 13 in serious injuries.  (The Dangers of Alarm Fatigue)

An article published in Outpatient Surgery describes one such case in which a 17 year old female was given Fentanyl in the recovery room in a bay where the monitor had been silenced.  The narcotic caused a respiratory arrest which went unnoticed due to the curtain pulled around the bed.  The patient suffered severe brain damage and died a few weeks later.  The settlement in the case was 6 million dollars and the CRNA was named in the suit along with the PACU staff because the anesthetist had left the patient with a monitor that had been muted.   Click here to read about the case.

The Joint Commission has named alarm fatigue as one of the top healthcare technology hazards and makes the following recommendations:

  • standard operating procedures for alarm management and response
  • an inventory of devices that sound alarms
  • guidelines for alarm settings and situations when alarm signals are not clinically necessary
  • regular training on alarm management and inspection of alarm-equipped devices
  • discussions to determine how to reduce nuisance alarms

Click here to read more from The Joint Commission regarding alarm fatigue

Monitor alarms are an important tool in the quest for patient safety and should not be disabled or muted.

Chief CRNA: Are Smartphones safe in the Operating Room?

We live in the age of instant access to information literally in the palm of your hand.  As more and more information becomes available on smartphones, notebooks and pads, their ligitimate use by healthcare workers has increased.   However, the device that delivers information can also create distractions.

Lawyers know that distracted healthcare workers are more likely to make errors and frequently examine phone records when investigating an injury to a patient.  The following come from the leagal blog “FindLaw KnowledgeBase

  • Medical errors and other adverse events in hospitals claim nearly 180,000 lives every year. This is an astonishing number, and it implicates all types of medical professionals providing care in a hospital setting.
  • More comprehensively, anesthesiologists are responsible for monitoring the condition of the patient throughout the surgical procedure. This includes paying close attention to oxygen levels and temperature.

 

An article published in Anaesth Intensive Care. 2012 Jan;40(1):71-8 By Jorm CM, O’Sullivan G. made the following points

  • Experienced anaesthetists are skilled at multi-tasking while maintaining situational awareness, but there are limits. Noise, interruptions and emotional arousal are detrimental to the cognitive performance of anaesthetists.
  • While limited reading during periods of low task load may not reduce vigilance, computer use introduces text-based activities that are more interactive and potentially more distracting

 

When preparing for legal action, lawyers commonly apply the standards set forth by the professional organization.  Non compliance with established guidelines strengthens the case against the anesthetist.  The AANA does not have a formal policy statement, however they have a position statement 2.18 regarding the use of mobile devices.  The following is from the AANA position statement 2.18

Mobile Devices may:

Aid communication
Cause a contamination risk
May distract anesthetists / reduce vigilance
Should never be used for reading, gaming or texting
Camera use violates HIPAA regulations
Use should follow institutional policy

 

The risks of Anesthetists distracted by mobile devices is well documented.  CRNAs are advised to avoid using devices for personal entertainment and to always base decisions on patient safety.

 

Clinical Topic: JCAHO Sentinal Event Regarding Opioids

Patient safety is a foundational responsibility of all health care workers.  The Joint Commission identifies “sentinel events” related to patient safety and distributes them to Hospitals.  During accreditation visits, JCAHO evaluates the Hospital’s effectiveness in addressing, reporting, and eliminating sentinel events.

“A Sentinel Event is defined by The Joint Commission (TJC) as any unanticipated event in a healthcare setting resulting in death or serious physical or psychological injury to a patient or patients, not related to the natural course of the patient’s illness.”  wikipedia

Examples of sentinel event are:

  • Infant abduction
  • Rape
  • Suicide
  • Transfusion reaction
  • Wrong surgery
  • Wrong radiation dose

Recently, the Joint Commission published a Sentinel Event related to the use of opioids in the Hospital.  The following points are included in the Sentinel event report:

  • Implement effective practices, such as monitoring patients who are receiving opioids on an ongoing basis, use pain management specialists or pharmacists to review pain management plans, and track opioid incidents.
  •  Use available technology to improve prescribing safety of opioids such as creating alerts for dosing limits, using tall man lettering in electronic ordering systems, using a conversion support system to calculate correct dosages and using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA).
  •   Provide education and training for clinicians, staff and patients about the safe use of opioids.
  •   Use standardized tools to screen patients for risk factors such as oversedation and respiratory depression.

By posting the Sentinel event, the Joint Commission has established guidelines for health care workers to follow, including anesthetists.  Click here to read the advisory published by the Joint Commission.

 

 

 

Clinical Topic: What’s your favorite Anesthesia APP?

Controversy remains as to whether or not cell phones (hand held computers with audio capability) and iPads have a place in the operating room.  It is true that they can be a distraction for healthcare workers but they also put a wealth of information at your finger tips.   When used appropriately, they provide instant information to the anesthetist that could make a difference in patient safety.

Recently, I posed the question to several of my colleagues; What is your favorite Anesthesia APP?  Below are a few of the favorites.  I am asking porcrna.com readers the same question.  What is your favorite APP?   Look over the APPs listed below and use the comment box below to share your experience with these APPs or to add your own favorites.

Epocrates:  This free drug reference is the #1 mobile drug reference for U.S. physicians. With it you can search brand, generic, and OTC medicines.  Plus, you can customize your homepage for quick access to the features you use most frequently.

 

abeoCoder gives access to CPT®, ASA CROSSWALKS®, and ICD codes right from your iPhone or BlackBerry. abeoCoder app provides you with codes, base units, descriptions and more.
Coding Made Easy.

 

Pedi Safe is an advanced airway management and cardiac resuscitation app. In an emergency, healthcare providers can quickly identify a patient’s weight or Broselow color, and then Pedi Safe displays all appropriate weight based dosing, equipment sizes, and normal vital signs. An excellent reference for doctors, nurses and paramedics!

drawMD; Using the iPad, Anesthesiologists can create interactive visual guides as a way to explain complex issues and possible medical and surgical solutions for Anesthesia and Critical Care-specific conditions and procedures, such as a central line chest tube, intubation, spinal epidural, etc.

 

One more just for fun…….and this one works on your pet too!

Alivecor has developed the iPhone ECG—a case that transforms the iPhone into a wireless, clinical quality heart monitor. The case is able to monitor one’s heart rate almost immediately, and can even measure through a cotton shirt!

Browse, enjoy and leave a comment to share your favorite APP with your colleagues.

Clinical Topic: Propofol – Remifentanil Sedation

Epidural Anesthesia is becoming increasingly popular for Orthopedic procedures of the lower extremities.  Anesthetists are tasked with keeping the patient comfortably sedated while the Epidural provides adequate anesthesia during the procedure.   The goal is to keep the patient oxygenated and comfortable with hemodynamic stability and a rapid wake up at the end of the case.   An increasing number of anesthetists are finding that the combination of propofol – remifentanil is the answer.

A.A. Samaan and V. Srinivasan published an observational study  done in the Department of Anaesthesia, Diana Princess of Wales Hospital, Grimsby, England.

As reported by the authors: “Regional anaesthesia offers many advantages for major joint replacement surgery of the lower limb. These operations are usually lengthy and carried out on elderly patients. There is a need for effective and controllable sedation with fast recovery profile. This   obviates the need to administer general anaesthesia in addition to the regional anaesthesia. We undertook to evaluate the efficacy and side effects of combined infusions of Propofol and Remifentanil in this clinical set up.”

“This is an observational study of 123 consecutive patients who required joint replacement surgery; primary hip, primary knee, revision hip, revision knee and bilateral hip replacement.  Epidural anaesthesia was performed in 111 patients.  The Epidural site was either high lumbar or low thoracic. The Local Anaesthetic used was Bupivacaine 0.5%, warmed to body temperature, with Adrenaline added to achieve the strength of 1:200,000. The motor and the sensory functions were checked to ensure adequate blockade.”

Patients were sedated during the surgery with a manually controlled Remifentanil infusion (20 mg per ml solution) and a Target Controlled Infusion of Propofol.

The authors conclude “Sedation with Propofol and Remifentanil complemented successful Epidural regional anaesthesia for major joint replacement surgery.  It was especially valuable in prolonged surgery such as in the case of revision hip replacements. This avoided the need for general anaesthesia.  Sedation with Propofol and Remifentanil is associated with minimal side effects, even in prolonged operations of durations up to 260 minutes, provided there is adherence to a carefully titrated dosage.  In our experience the average infusion rate for Propofol was 2.5 mg.kg.hr and 0.02 mg.kg .min for Remifentanil.”

Click here to read the study and return to procrna.com to share your comments with your colleagues.

Clinical Topic: Handwashing Standards

New patient safety guidelines require increased vigilance in handwashing by healthcare providers.  Previous guidelines established by OSHA required soap and water handwashing between every patient contact.  Over the past few years, alcohol based handwashing agents have been introduced to the hospital setting raising the question about their efficacy and risk.

An article By Gina Pugliese, RN, MS; Judene Bartley, MS, MPH, CIC; Tammy Lundstrom, MD, reviews the topic of the use of alcohol based handwashing solutions.  They state:

“The evidence is clear; HCW compliance with hand hygiene can reduce the 2 million healthcare-associated infections that occur in patients annually, as well as reduce the risk of infections transmitted to workers. But the use of these waterless alcohol-based hand antiseptics, the centerpiece of the new CDC guideline, has been perceived to be in conflict with existing healthcare safety regulations. These include, for example, handwashing requirements from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), flammability issues from the National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA), and corridor obstruction issues from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).”

The article goes on to discuss the fire risk related to the use of alcohol based handwashing solutions.  As CMS tightens enforcement of handwashing in the healthcare workplace, this information is essential for CRNAs.  Click here to read the article and return to PROCRNA.COM to share your comments.  ( If the link takes you to an ad, wait about 5 seconds and it will go on to the article)

Clinical Topic: Patient Safety, The Helsinki Declaration

The European Board of and Society of Anesthesiology have adopted the Helsinki Declaration for Patient Safety in Anesthesia and have made recommendations for standards that further improve patient safety.

The authors state that patient safety has 3 components; a set of guiding principles, a body of knowledge and a collection of tools.  The basic principles are the tendency for things to go wrong is both natural and normal, rather than an opportunity to find someone to blame; safety can be improved by analyzing errors and critical incidents, rather than pretending they have not happened; and humans, machines and equipment are all part of a system, the component parts of which interact to make the system safe or unsafe.

The following Abstract was printed in the European Journal of Anesthesiology:

Anaesthesiology, which includes anaesthesia, perioperative care, intensive care medicine, pain therapy and emergency medicine, has always participated in systematic attempts to improve patient safety. Anaesthesiologists have a unique, cross-specialty opportunity to influence the safety and quality of patient care. Past achievements have allowed our specialty a perception that it has become safe, but there should be no room for complacency when there is more to be done. Increasingly older and sicker patients, more complex surgical interventions, more pressure on throughput, new drugs and devices and simple chance all pose hazards in the work of anaesthesiologists. In response to this increasingly difficult and complex working environment, the European Board of Anaesthesiology (EBA), in cooperation with the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA), has produced a blueprint for patient safety in anaesthesiology. This document, to be known as the Helsinki Declaration on Patient Safety in Anaesthesiology, was endorsed by these two bodies together with the World Health Organization (WHO), the World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists (WFSA), and the European Patients’ Federation (EPF) at the Euroanaesthesia meeting in Helsinki in June 2010. The Declaration represents a shared European view of that which is worthy, achievable, and needed to improve patient safety in anaesthesiology in 2010. The Declaration recommends practical steps that all anaesthesiologists who are not already using them can successfully include in their own clinical practice. In parallel, EBA and ESA have launched a joint patient safety task-force in order to put these recommendations into practice. It is planned to review this Declaration document regularly.

The original article by Staender et al is a “must read” for all providers who sincerely seek to improve patient safety.  Click here to read the original article.

Return to procrna.com to share your thoughts with your colleagues.

Distracted Health Care Providers

Hospitals across the nation have encouraged the use of computers, ipads, smart phones and other devices to improve the access of health care workers to information essential for safe patient care.  Information about lab interpretation, drugs, and diagnosis are all readily available on line.  In some institutions, the Anesthetist is encouraged to call or text the Recovery area prior to delivering a fresh post-op patient.  It now appears that the use of technology can be a two edged sword.

In addition to the intended use of electronic devices to enhance patient care, there is increasing evidence that health care providers are becoming distracted from patient care.   A front page article by Matt Richtel in the New York times titled  “As Doctors Use More Devices, Potential for Distraction Grows?” tells of a Neurosurgeon taking 10 personal calls during a case in which the patient was harmed.  An article in Perfusion magazine reported that nearly half of the perfusionists in a survey admitted to texting or making a personal call while the patient was on cardiopulmonary bypass.  Other stories include Circulating nurses making airline reservations during a case as well as texting facebook friends.

Patient advocate Suzanne Gordon writes of the problem of distracted drivers using cell phones and notes that 15 states still do not have laws against texting while driving.  When discussing the case of the Neurosurgeon making numerous calls during surgery, she asks “where were the other OR staff when this was going on?”  She notes that the same people who are texting in their cars are now texting while doing patient care.  Suzanne recommends that one person in the operating room be designated as the only person to have access to cell phones during the case.

The challenge for health care workers is to fix the problem themselves before congress or Joint Commission imposes new rules.  We must remember that the welfare of the patient comes first and resist the urge to text, call, or surf the net while providing patient care.